Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Poletaria
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete, noting that I generally consider my userspace deletions a "soft delete", by default (notwithstanding extenuating circumstances). kelapstick(bainuu) 13:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:FAKEARTICLE without any content apart from an infobox. Would be WP:CSD#U5-eligible, were it not for the bizarre addition the user has made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Participants that, amusingly, survives to this day. —Keφr 09:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:CSD#U5-eligible. The wording of U5 "the owner has made few or no edits ..." could be improved using words such as "useful", or changing "edits" to "contributions". The page is clearly not material intended to contribute to the project. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- SoftDelete without prejudice against un-deletion. The most obvious possible use this has to anyone other than the creator is to researchers who are studying the use or attempted use of user pages for the purposes of humor, or similar studies of user pages, and I'll be the first to admit that even at that, the value is so low that "nothing of value is lost" if it is soft-deleted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Utter nonsense. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: perhaps U5 eligible but definitely not useful to the encyclopedia. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 09:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.