Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Perspicatus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 19:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Perspicatus[edit]

WP:FAKEARTICLE for a non-notable church. A mainspace article for the same church was deleted via PROD for lack of notability. Whpq (talk) 15:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--promotional too. Drmies (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Chunks are written in conversational tone/first person, and the church doesn't appear to meet organizational notability standards. /wia /tlk 17:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a local though unfamiliar with this particular church, can say it's unlikely this will be notable anytime soon. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.