Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Openaccesssupporter/Journal of bioequivalence & Bioavailability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was DELETE Jehochman ^Talk 15:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Openaccesssupporter/Journal of bioequivalence & Bioavailability[edit]

Sandbox stub on a non-notable journal created by a user who has been blocked for sockpuppetry while POV-pushing on the article of the publisher of this journal. Randykitty (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keep no need to delete this at this point, it has not been around too long. The purpose of creation may have been promotional, but this page is not promotional. Notability is neither proved or disproved, and as a draft it can get a chance from the sockmaster or other interested party to rescue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please have a look at the article on the publisher. It is highly unlikely that any of the journals of this rather shady publisher will become notable any time soon. At this point, they're no interested in promoting theuir journals, just in seeming to look respectable. Hence a whole herd of sockpuppets creating articles on journals and editorial board members and edit-warring on the publisher's article. In any case: if it is the notability of this particular journal that you are concerned about: it's zilch. No independent sources, not listed in any selective database, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to a new section at Talk:List of open-access journals, suggesting consideration of inclusion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Surely nobody is going to be working on the sandbox of a sock-puppeteer. Apart from this deletion debate, nobody knows about the sandbox article except the sock-puppeteer.--Toddy1 (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.