Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nouroze/sandbox/Nouroze Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Draft was speedily deleted at 12:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC) by Jimfbleak with the deletion rationale being G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: no independent sources, no evidence of notability, self-written vanity page, see WP:YFA. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor Talk 22:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nouroze/sandbox/Nouroze Khan[edit]

User:Nouroze/sandbox/Nouroze Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nonstarter, no sources found. Possible COI. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral - Definitely no sources. Definitely a non-starter. Definite COI. But is it worth MFD on the first submit, or can we wait to see if it is resubmitted or expires? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are indeed no sources, an a COI seems clear. But this is still a sandbox page, it hasn't even been submitted to AfC yet, let alone declined. Let us see what sources, if any, the creator can find before we even consider deleting this. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete no conceivably hope for an article. DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete G11 and so tagged. Promotional and sourced only to “Nouroze Khan on YouTube” & “Nouroze Khan on Facebook” & “Nouroze Khan on Dailymotion”, all absolutely unsuitable sources, the sourced content cannot be used, it is squarely G11 eligible. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It is odd that three people above have asserted “no sources”. There have always been three sources, three unsuitable sources, sources that point the decision making process st sight to G11. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.