Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Midnight68/Panchira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Midnight68/Panchira

Subpage of user who is indef blocked by ArbCom without right of appeal. I guess this sort of thing may be at least tangentially involved in why he was blocked, so lets get rid of it. Herostratus (talk) 06:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The block is with right of appeal. It even said how such appeal could be made. It's also worth noting that the block was not accompanied by any edits, by arbitrators or otherwise, to revert this addition to panchira, which this page is apparently a userspace draft for. Having said that, I'm not sure what use was intended for a 1-edit draft that was not, as the edit summary claimed, a rewrite, but in fact was hardly different from the article state itself of 2 minutes before and not used an hour later. Uncle G (talk) 14:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh OK, sorry if I misunderstood the terms, but my point was, if I understand the situation correctly, this person is never coming back. Herostratus (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's a possibility. Although given the existence of es:Usuario:Midnight68/Panchira and ru:Участник:Midnight68/panchira I think that some people at Commons and at the English Wikipedia have not seen and addressed the whole scope of the issue. Uncle G (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as abandoned. Matt Deres (talk) 01:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host and private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion" (mine emphasized).
Because this userpage draft violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, and because the userpage draft is less developed than panchira, User:Midnight68/Panchira should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.