Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mel Etitis/Mademoiselle Sabina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep - appropriate material for userspace Trödel 04:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mel Etitis/Mademoiselle Sabina

Userpage created soley to continue dispute and make unfounded accusations of personal attacks against another Wikipedian who disagreed with his edits. Creator has deleted all comments on the Talk Page that refute his accusations and has not made any attempt to seek mediation for dispute. Please also see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mel_Ettis. Mademoiselle Sabina 22:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing in the page's history to indicate that there ever was a page by this name until you created it by putting the MFD tag on it. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was no UserPage; only the Talk Page was active. I put the MFD tag on the front page because that is where the page creator has linked people. Mademoiselle Sabina 22:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then the tag is on the wrong page, and I vote Delete this page, but keep the Talk page, which is perfectly civil and is an acceptable use of User space. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm moving the tag. However, I feel the Talk page should be deleted because it is an unfounded personal attack. The creator deletes all messages contrary to his statements, and the page was created soley for showcasing his side of the matter. Mademoiselle Sabina 22:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what. Ignore it! --FloNight ^talk

22:53, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Need to stop it now. I wasn't an attack page. By the way, Mademoiselle Sabina, this is one of the silliest disputes I seen on Wikipedia. Both of you need to quit reading what the other is writing and stop responding to each other. FloNight ^talk 22:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right, it is ridiculous and I should just ignore it. There are much more important things to worry about here. Difficult, though, when he keeps linking to this page from my own Talk Page, in spite of numerous requests to stop commenting and end the discussion. Mademoiselle Sabina 23:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mademoiselle Sabina, come on now. Do the right thing and take the tag off and end the Rfc. This is too much fuss about something really stupid to argue about. FloNight ^talk

23:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to, believe me. However, shouldn't something be said by someone to the other user about his hostile behavior and repeated personal attacks? I'd be happy to take this to another sort of mediation if you can suggest it. Mademoiselle Sabina 23:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it makes you feel better, I know that you were correct about the word in question. It was used properly : ) --FloNight ^talk

23:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Not only is it calm and dispassionate in tone, it also appears to be pretty accurate. Mel is a prolific and hard-working editor with ample evidence of good faith. I suggest the combatabnts settle their dispute with wet fish at dawn. Just zis Guy you know? 23:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.