Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MMADon101/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Deleted G5 : Creation by a banned or blocked user (BigzMMA) in violation of ban or block by RHaworth (NAC) Mt king ^(edits) 10:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:MMADon101/sandbox[edit]

Sandbox of a confirmed sock and indef. banned user. Recreation of material previously deleted. Can only be used for disruption. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As evidenced by Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BigzMMA/sandbox the writing is on the wall, yet the master of puppets continues. Hasteur (talk) 17:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BigzMMA/sandbox and G5 by User:BigzMMA. Mt king ^(edits) 21:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although blocked, and this page was created after the block, it is not clear that this is in violation of any ban so perhaps speedy delete is dubious, so I vote for the more definitive delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G5 does covered blocked as well as banned. Mt king ^(edits) 22:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the point where we can have a consensus to delete everything from this user. At lesat this is not a G4. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If WP:CSD#G5 applies, use it. Only bring it to MfD if there is something to be discussed. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with speedy, I brought here out of habit more than anything. Deleting it today or in a week doesn't change much. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy is not really about speed, it is about efficient processing of clear-cut cases. G5 speedies are also desirable per WP:DENY. Block evasion should not be rewarded by a high profile discussion of the details of the material added while blocked. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.