Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Looper2222/LAIAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Looper2222/LAIAD

abandoned draft MB 06:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn MB 01:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:STALE, WP:RAGPICKING, and WP:TIND. One might also raise the ponderance: why this userspace draft over any other userspace draft that has not been edited in a while? — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 07:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and blank if you must, but no PAG based reason for deletion has been supplied. If a userpage is speediable then tag it for speedy. If you think the current content is an issue, blank it. If the page is not speeidable and the content is problematic even if blanked then and only then should an mfd be initiated. That means there must be a clear reason to conceal the history.
Using mfd to clean the userspace of others is not productive. The negative to the community of editors policing others userspace is a bigger negative than leaving these things alone. There's endless reams of abandoned junk in userspace but it's all noindexed and impossible to find, and the links are nofollowed and do nothing for seo. If we systemically went through all of it mfd would be completely overwhelmed, and to what purpose? Especially when there's so much junk in mainspace. If you want to use your time efficiently go start by cleaning out backlogs like Category:All articles lacking sources or Category:All articles with topics of unclear notability, or hell just Category:All pages needing cleanup and remember the articles in those are indexed and actually can be found. If you want to flood some place with deletion noms then flood afd where this actually matters. Bluntly stated noms like this serve no purpose except wasting people’s time, sorry. Regards, 81.177.3.8 (talk) 17:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.