Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LegoAxiom1007/monobook.js

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep and refer to WP:AN/I and/or WP:RFC. MFD is not the place to ban users from running user scripts. Warn/Block, followed by longer blocks if they are being disruptive. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:LegoAxiom1007/monobook.js

Please see User:LegoAxiom1007's edits. He has been consistently abusing Twinkle. His monobook should be deleted and salted to prevent this abuse. WP:AIV rejected a vandalism report [1]. Nardman1 20:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of his edits appear legitimate but most of them are sheer nonsense. See his talk page. Nardman1 20:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/question: Is Twinkle a script that requires approval before use (a la Vandalproof)? If so, having the approval revoked might be a more straightforward procedure than this MfD, as I for one have no ability to look at script code and tell if it's legitimate or not. Newyorkbrad 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, the code is available here. The code is perfectly legit, it's the user's actions with it that are suspect. He even has one block for misusing Twinkle and multiple requests for him to stop using it on his talk page. Basically everything he's been warned for (invalid AIV reports, invalid protection requests, invalid diff reversions, etc) are all based on just randomly applying this tool to the wikipedia whether it was a good edit or not. Nardman1 23:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't delete my Javascript page! I need it for future scripts. Why are you deleting it? >:( IsuzuAxiom1007 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not the way to do this. The purpose of MfD is not to ban people from using scripts, no matter how much they deserve it. I've already suggested it over at the community ban discussion, but there are valid reasons he might want other Javascript, so even then it wouldn't be appropriate. -Amarkov moo! 04:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you mean you're not going to delete my JavaScript file? IsuzuAxiom1007 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... this is a discussion to determine that, and it isn't over yet, I don't think. I wouldn't be the one deleting it anyway, like anyone else who commented here. -Amarkov moo! 04:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess so. So, do you love my WikiLove template? --IsuzuAxiom1007 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... I don't know... if he's misusing the scripts, then there must be another way to solve that problem... Ab e g92contribs 11:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Proper way to handle this is through warnings, blocking, and banning, if it comes to that. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep But warn him not to abuse TWINKLE (or to stop using it altogether). If he/she continues, block. Much simpler than this IMHO. · AO ^Talk 00:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.