Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Leecannon11/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Acceptable use of a sandbox by a recently active editor. RL0919 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Leecannon11/sandbox[edit]

This seems to be someone's alternate history sandbox. It is unlikely to ever be used in an encyclopedia article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per WP:UP#COPIES. Content forking, no attempt at proper attribution. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw that opinion. On review, I do no think this sandbox contains enough creative content that has been copied without sufficient attribution for it to be considered a real problem. --23:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Delete - Interesting, but belongs in some other medium than Wikipedia. G3 may not apply to sandboxes, but Use Common Sense applies. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this appears to be a complex set of editing test, which is one to the things a sandbox is supposed to be used for. It looks as if it is exploring how various political tempaltes work by usaign thenm to describe events thast never happened. I see no indications tha tthis is beign used to create fake articles, or to use this directly as a draft. Nor did anyone ask any questions of the user about this. It celarly isn't a valid draft of any articel, but then it doesn't claim to be one. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep, as DESiegel said, this looks like a sandbox being used for... what else? Sandboxing! Maybe in a year or so, if the user has not edited any more, if we really want to tidy up, but not now. - Nabla (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.