Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lavd/Nikita Denisenkov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC(talk) 20:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lavd/Nikita Denisenkov[edit]

User:Lavd/Nikita Denisenkov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A very stale draft. A user asked me to userfy this after it was deleted at AFD six years ago. That request was heir last edit, this draft has had no substantive improvements in that time. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to carry out the AfD will. Legacypac (talk) 01:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This draft is dead, and needs burial. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I think blanking per WP:STALEDRAFT would suffice, but I suppose there could be a minor case that this is slightly "problematic even if blanked" because it concerns a living person. Lavd has not edited since 2012 (unlike the other case). On a tangent, I also strongly approve of administrators restoring pages upon request. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring it on request is exactly what I did six years ago, and nothing came of it. While we don’t automatically delete stale drafts anymore, six years is a bit long to wait for them to pop back up and fix it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.