Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Josef9/Acomplishments of the President Trump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted per U1 by Fastily. (non-admin closure) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 10:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Josef9/Acomplishments of the President Trump[edit]

WP:POVFORK of First 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That article is for his first 100 days... this article is for all his acomplishments he has and have through his whole presidency... --Josef9 (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely unnecessary if we have the 100 article. TheValeyard (talk) 05:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- This guy has openly anti-Trump bias...1 2 3--Josef9 (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have a bias against silly things that fawn over the subject, perhaps. The 1st link is a bit of a jest or jab, nothing to take direly seriously. 2nd & 3rd were my misunderstanding on how these disambiguating pages work, from a month ago. I thought they should just be plain lists with no indication of importance, to avoid bias towards a perceived "primary" topic. TheValeyard (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Content is pilfered from Timeline of the presidency of Donald Trump, and selectively chosen for hagiography. No value. — JFG ^talk 06:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We don't write hagiographies here. -- BullRangifer (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, userspace notes of this level are well within leeway. I guess that this case draws this attention due to it being a contentious topic, and the clumsiness of the author. Josef9 (talk · contribs) has been here four years, and has edited on a variety of topics, and this counts in favour of trusting him with normal leeway in userspace. Counting against him are his redlinked userpage, low edit count (total edits 113), and the spelling of the title of this page. The POVFORK and pilfering arguments are not persuasive on their own, although Josef9 should take more care to reference the source of everything copied. "No value", and First 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency are strong points. I advise Josef9 to seek to work collaboratively, not alone in userspace in avoidance of other editors interesting in the same thing, and to keep these notes offsite if he must keep them, and I lean Delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.