Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JohnnyMrNinja/Lame password (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ‑Scottywong | [squeal] || 17:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:JohnnyMrNinja/Lame password

This just seems like a really bad idea for a userbox. This was nominated for deletion once before, but since consensus can change in 12 years, what with compromised admin accounts and other security issues, is this really something we want anyone advertising, even if it is "only a joke"? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:49, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - See Wikipedia is not for (bad) jokes. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I never liked this userbox when I put in a category to begin with, worthless piece of junk.Catfurball (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per either WP:BEANS or WP:TROLL. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I'm not a big fan of this userbox and won't particularly miss it if it's deleted. Having said that, I don't see how this violates WP:UBCR. I understand that, per NOTWEBHOST, The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration; nevertheless, it goes on to say that Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace and this seems to fit the bill, especially as it is a mere userbox. I know that there is consensus to ban disruptive jokes on userpages, but I don't think that this is disruptive by virtue of the fairly small number of people that would actually take the "challenge" to heart. Feel free to delete if the consensus says otherwise. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Britishfinance (talk) 14:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.