Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jenhanc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (Radiant) 08:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jenhanc

Not an active editor's page: Only edits (6) were on April 4th, to this page to uploading the photo on the page, and adding self to Gervacio Santos. WP is not MySpace/a free webhost. Was tagged with PROD, but tag removed without comment by User:Luna Santin, so I guess we have to do this the hard way. Calton | Talk 13:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Calton. No contributions outside of this non-notable userfied article. We're not MySpace. A Train ^{take the} 15:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning delete. To be fair, I did delete all but I think two of the userpages you tagged. ;) Since I have no experience as to community consensus regarding this sort of deletion, I figured sending the few pages of editors who actually had an edit or two to MfD for a reality check couldn't hurt. If consensus tells me I should have deleted under prod, for editors with such scant and long-past contribs, I'll do so in the future. Luna Santin 23:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is what you missed. MER-C 06:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, the whole PROD tagging of user pages is a recent development, so I can understand the caution. --Calton | Talk 12:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the User claims to be the creator and the subject of the photo. I think one of these is inaccurate. If she is the subject, then she can't be the creator, if she's the creator and not the subject, the User name should be blocked for claiming to be a celebrity, as nn as she may be. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Ever heard of setting timers on cameras? — Rickyrab | Talk 23:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: Must have been inconvenient doing that in the middle of a performance. --Calton | Talk 00:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Exactly. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is becoming a tangent, but she could be the copyright holder. --Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-14 05:38Z
Delete per nom. MER-C 06:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Dar-Ape 04:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, delete, delete! Yuser31415 23:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.