Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hilda hutton/Janice Murillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedied. Although presumably created in good faith, the page contains multiple BLP violations, and there is no acceptable version to revert to. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hilda hutton/Janice Murillo[edit]

Stale draft about a non-notable person. Orange Mike | Talk 23:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accelerate delete - The draft has been around since 8 August 2009 and does not have a chance of being a viable article, so delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. Apparently, User:Janicemurillo just discovered User:Hilda hutton's three year old posting of Janice Murillo's personal information on the internet and wants it removed: "janice murillo did not authorize this data to be displayed" [1] and "i want the article about me, JAnice Murillo, deleted. I did not authorize my personal information to be displayed or public. How can i delete it?"[2]. Accelerte delete per BLP. No objection to blanking the page while this discussion continues. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, quickly if possible. The page isn't NOINDEXed so it appears in searches; the subject's requests for deletion would not carry weight in a mainspace article, but should be taken into account when it comes to a poorly sourced userspace draft of dubious quality. - Ka renjc 10:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, in a speedy fashion.--ukexpat (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The draft is stale and abandoned, the subject isn't notable, and as Karenjc said, the page lacks the NOINDEX property. The page should be deleted quickly, because BLP concerns have been raised.--xanchester (t) 18:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.