Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hertfordshire1234/Prince Elliott
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete both. —harej (talk) (cool!) 04:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Closing instructions
User Hertfordshire1234 (talk · contribs) (currently blocked for a week) and his sockpuppet Englandrules123 (talk · contribs) have input numerous hoax articles purporting to show that "Elliott Dashwood" or "Elliott Windsor" is a member of the British aristocracy. These user pages are more of his fantasies in preparation and have nothing to do with writing an encyclopedia. -- JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete if these are hoax articles in waiting. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Had to go through a shed load of the hoax articles myself and these two pages are more of the same. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.— Dædαlus Contribs 03:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, you may want to have a look at Prince Elliott of Sussex; I've tagged it for speedying as a hoax three times, and the creator keeps removing the tag. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 21:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, not quite the same content but near enough, and it bears out Totnesmartin's deletion rationale as hoaxes in waiting. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.