Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Henchman 2000/Sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was a unanimous delete. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Henchman 2000/Sandbox[edit]

This was created in mid-April, because the articles were deleted in AFDs. Since then: very few edits have been made to these. Wikipedia isn't a webhosting service. This editor could've put it in a word document, printed it off or whatever, then had them removed, but didn't. Frankly the content probably wont ever be suitable for Wikipedia. We shouldn't be storing deleted content in the hope of it being suitable. RobJ1981 22:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The history log shows that Mailer Diablo userfied some deleted pages on 24 April, and not much has happened since then. If the user intended to fix up these articles, he should have done some of the work by now. Delete and allow the user to request temporary undeletion for copying to off-site, as is standard. Shalom ^Hello 02:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shalom. I doubt this content could ever be improved, no matter how long it stays. There hasn't been much effort made to improve it. WP:NOT#USER. — Malcolm ^talk 17:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There seems to be no on-going effort to improve this material. In its current state it looks very unsuitable for the encyclopedia. EdJohnston 20:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.