Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hemlock Martinis/Kingdom of Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hemlock Martinis/Kingdom of Wikipedia[edit]

User:Hemlock Martinis/Kingdom of Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Funny, but Wikipedia userspace is not for permanent storage of joke articles. User has not edited in a while. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep harmless, even somewhat amusing. If it wasn't in userspace there might be a case for userfying it, but as it is.... As for the idea that the author hasn't edited in a while, actually they have edited in the last couple of months. Not that that is particularly relevant to an MFD. ϢereSpielChequers 20:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Strikes me as a perfectly reasonable user essay about Wikipedia, written as allegory. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. 'Wikipedia userspace is not for permanent storage of joke articles' - I'd say that's one of the better uses of userspace, actually. This one's causing no harm and some amusement, and is unlikely to be ever mistaken for a real article. Robofish (talk) 21:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Amusing & certainly worth keeping!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 02:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if this is kept, it should be marked with the humor banner template {{Humor}} and possibly the Essay template -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It has enough opinion to be a user essay. I added {{Humorous essay}}. -- Jreferee (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Related to the project. Age and author's current activity not relevant. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as wiki-related and (this one probably holds no sway in MfD discussions but I'll say it anyways) thoroughly amusing. CaseyPenk (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.