Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HAZWOPERINTERNATIONAL
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. WP:SNOW and unanimous apply here.. -- Cirt (talk) 02:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, really. Content is copied from HAZWOPER. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE; the username is arguably blockable as well. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Go ahead and block it. Aren't you an admin yet? Seriously, I am not sure about that name. It's odd, but I don't think it's promotional or really disruptive--do we have a policy against all-caps? Drmies (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- WP:Requests for adminship/The Blade of the Northern Lights, as of writing, is a redlink. However, Hazwoper International is a part of OSHA, hence my concern; it's borderline. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Go ahead and block it. Aren't you an admin yet? Seriously, I am not sure about that name. It's odd, but I don't think it's promotional or really disruptive--do we have a policy against all-caps? Drmies (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete-- WP:FAKEARTICLE. --E♴(talk) 23:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 21:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.