Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans[edit]

User:Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Gyrocentrism93/Sandbox
User:Gyrocentrism93/Gyrocentrism
User:Gyrocentrism93

Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans (talk · contribs) and Gyrocentrism93 (talk · contribs), who are presumably the same person, have been using these pages for self-promotion. They have made no contributions to Wikipedia except to promote this book (or whatever it is) by Robert M Evans titled Gyrocentrism on several user pages. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST, these pages should be deleted. Peacock (talk) 21:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:No original research. I have blocked "User:Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans" as an advertising-only account, and will explain things to Mr Evans at his other account. JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Not suitable per WP:UP, and is using Wikipedia only to host personal thoughts regarding some idea that can never be helpful to the encyclopedia. Johnuniq (talk) 07:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all and, optionally, checkuser both accounts (Gyrocentrism93 and Gyrocentrism: By Robert M Evans). J u n k c o p s (want to talk?|my log) 16:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see any point to a checkuser - it's clearly the same person, he doesn't understand (and we don't explain clearly to newbies) that accounts are only for individual contributors, but he hasn't tried to vote-stack or do anything contrary to WP:SOCK. JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.