Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gr8opinionater/Userboxes/Juche
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Goes against WP:UBCR by promoting a highly divisive ideology that has killed hundreds of thousands of people. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 02:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- You're probably trying to make a point, but Delete as violating WP:UBCR as highly divisive and also
Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for: ... Propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind (commercial, political, religious, or otherwise)
and accordingly violating WP:NOT (specifically WP:NOTADVOCACY and WP:NOTOPINION). ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I'm trying to make a point but I'm not disrupting Wikipedia to make that point. Being WP:POINTy would be a bad faith nomination of a userbox when I don't actually believe it meets the criteria because I believe the rules were applied wrongly in another case (there's a WP:NOTPOINTy policy that outlines the distinction). In this case I believe that this userbox fails the UBCR criteria in the same way that the fascist userbox I !voted to delete did due to the advocacy of political violence as a mean to resolve disputes being antithetical to Wikipedia believing in discussion to solve disputes (it's really saying "I advocate violence against those that disagree with me"). That and the reasons I listed above. Chess (talk) (please use
{{reply to|Chess}}on reply) 20:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I'm trying to make a point but I'm not disrupting Wikipedia to make that point. Being WP:POINTy would be a bad faith nomination of a userbox when I don't actually believe it meets the criteria because I believe the rules were applied wrongly in another case (there's a WP:NOTPOINTy policy that outlines the distinction). In this case I believe that this userbox fails the UBCR criteria in the same way that the fascist userbox I !voted to delete did due to the advocacy of political violence as a mean to resolve disputes being antithetical to Wikipedia believing in discussion to solve disputes (it's really saying "I advocate violence against those that disagree with me"). That and the reasons I listed above. Chess (talk) (please use
- Delete per WP:UBCR. — csc-1 11:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NAZI. Casspedia (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I usually ignore stupid userboxes. This one is a past and present danger. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Arccosecant. EpicPupper (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.