Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeneralIroh/Special (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete --Killiondude (talk) 07:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:GeneralIroh/Special[edit]

Yet another hidden page thing. We need to make a new rule called WP:SECRET PAGES. December21st2012Freak , (talk to me, or else...) 21:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UP#Games and WP:NOTMYSPACE. ArcAngel (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep Page is up for deletion on WP:MFD, the more appropriate venue for this issue. Nate • (chatter) 22:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per ArcAngel. And I have not a clue what Mrschimpf/Nate meant; this is at MfD now. → ROUX ₪ 23:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It had been posted in the daily AfD log for some reason, but I see now that it has been removed to here. I convert my vote to Neutral as this is now in the correct venue. Nate • (chatter) 00:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
D-l33t per ArcAngel. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons given for several similar pages in recent MfDs. --RL0919 (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~. Reasonable leeway for a productive editor, and these playthings are not entirely useless. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blank as, as per DGG below, this wikipedian is not currently active. However, do not delete because it is disconcerting and unwelcoming for a returning editor to return and be unable to find familiar things, such as his history of edits. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not actually an active WPedian--last edit was Feb 2008, over 1.5 years ago. These games are In my opinion only of some value in retaining active productive editors who devote more time to editing than to game-playing. They can then be tolerated as contributing to overall productivity. I've been deciding between keep/delete for these on that basis. DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTMYSPACE and WP:UP#Games. Secret pages do not contribute to building the encyclopedia. Cunard (talk) 01:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per DGG's comments - if a user is active, then leeway in things like this can be given - but this user is not active. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 11:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-WP:NOTMYSPACE, WP:UP#Games. I feel like we do need a new policy on hidden pages.--SKATER ^Speak. 14:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.