Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ftheyukuza/The Orphan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 21:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ftheyukuza/The Orphan[edit]

WEBHOST violation. Not even clear who this is about, but not being used in an article and user is long gone. Contested U5 CSD. Legacypac (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - no indication from nominator why they think this user page is being used as a web host. VQuakr (talk) 00:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

where do you want this used in the encyclopedia then? Legacypac (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a user draft. Just leave it there. VQuakr (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user has made several hundred edits to their userspace to keep these lists updated for some reason unrelated to wikipedia. They have only edited one actual article a few times. Classic WebHost violation. Then they stopped doing anything in 2012 making this all stale. Legacypac (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A classic webhost violation would be a restaurant updating their specials daily, and directing customers to their user space on en.wiki to check them. Most definitely not the case here. "Stale" is not a policy-based reason to delete a draft. VQuakr (talk) 01:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the user is record keeping for their own use. You obviously don't understand webhost. Legacypac (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF applies. Your suspicions are irrelevant. VQuakr (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence shows no on wiki purpose, and the effort suggests an off wiki purpose. You have evidence to the contrary? Legacypac (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence shows collating information on a person who may or may meet WP:N in the effort of building an article. This is a reasonable usage of WP user space and is not at odds with the goals of this project. It's AGF, not ABF - the onus is on you to show that a page is being used as a webhost. VQuakr (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete Editor is keeping track of Matt Hughes (fighter)'s individual bouts (check the first two UFC match pages) which is fine and all but it's already at Matt_Hughes_(fighter)#Mixed_martial_arts_record. If the editor wants to include that or create a split, then the editor can make a suggestion to do so. Otherwise, it's a WP:UP#COPIES of current content. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in favour of Matt_Hughes_(fighter)#Mixed_martial_arts_record. Nomination completely inept. Not so serious a WP:UP#COPIES issue as it is only a table (not copyrightable), using a table to "keep track of" developing facts is OK, but as it is now years abandoned, yes, delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.