Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FFA P-16

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:FFA P-16[edit]

Non-notable information out of deleted articles, now presented as user page but in fact to circumvent the deletions. The Banner talk 18:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is my user page, So i can show there my opinion and say what i think is important. deleting this userpage is cenzorship and surpressing the freedom of speach.. FFA P-16 (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:User pages about what is allowed on user pages. You can show your opinion, but it is not allowed to publish articles on your user pages, especially when you are circumventing AfD-discussions. The Banner talk 19:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"You can show your opinion" It is my opinion that this informations should beon wikipeda. so stop cencor informations.. I also dont delet your unimportant restaurand links on your page. Still interesting that youare fighting against any publication of information about the Superpuma Solodisplay and F/A-18 solodisplay, on the other hand you don't care about these Greek Solodisplay F-16 Demo Team or the Solo Display Team.Mhh Wikihounding? Everything related with swiss aviatic is not important ..? FFA P-16 (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a private user page that obviously doesn't violate WP:UP.--MBurch (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ow, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Puma Display Team. And no, mr. FFA, no wikihounding. Just pointing at the fact that you try to reinstate non-relevant info. Like so many trivia that you find of the utmost importance. The Banner talk 22:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does no mater , if I want to share something who is for me important on my userpage I can do this, because a userpage is not a articelpage.. It's wikihounding.. if "it is non-relevant" like you say the F-16 Demo Team or the Solo Display Team would be " non-relevant" too but is very interesting that you don't do a thing against this two "unimportant things. But you are very eagr to delet as much as possible who is about swiss aviatic..and now you are attaking my userpage. sorry but this looks to me like Wikihounding or racist against Switzerland. FFA P-16 (talk) 10:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, mr. FFA, go on like this and you will find yourself on AN/I soon. The Banner talk 12:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FFA P-16:
The Banner, I think that you aren't too much polite.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the face of lack of competence and personal attacks I am indeed not friendly and polite but strict and to the point. The Banner talk 14:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner, Only threats does not change the fact that you with all your strength trying to sabotage everything I do. Your threats do not conceal that you want to censor subjects only at Swiss Aviation topics whose existence on other placesn cause you there not to be active. You are the one who lack competence and ride with your wikihounding personal attacks and anti swiss aivatic attitude. FFA P-16 (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have told you many times before that not every blip is notable and still you start an edit war over every trivial detail. Unfortunately, the only thing you do is shouting and roaring, accusing me from all bad things in the world and ignore all advice I have given you. And still you go on and on with your personal attacks. The Banner talk 21:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For me it looks exactly the other way around The Banner and regarding the comment from Zurich00swiss I'm probably not the only one that thinks that way...--MBurch (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Pilatus PC-24 for example. The Banner talk 16:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if we look at the past over 12 months, The Banner is every day very active on wikipedia (nothing weong with this), but usualy he is not avtive in aviatic topics. In this timeframe:

He "worked" only on 3 Airports, Amsterdam (propaply because he is from the netherlands) , Dublin (probably because he live in Ireland) he doesn't worked on any other Airport article of the whole world.. except of deleting out informations of Zürich Airport (the biggest Airport of SWITZERLAND).
The only Air Force Base he was "working" on was the Dübendorf Air Base (an Air Force Base of SWITZERLAND) trying to delet out informations about the Zero-G flight and other stuff.he doesn't worked on any other Air Force Base article of the whole world.. and BTW Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dübendorf Air Base The only Air Base he want have deleted was an Air Base from SWITZERLAND. No oter tiny dusty airfiled somewere...
The only aircraft project he want have deleted was not for e.g. the Bartini A-57, Lockheed L-2000 or Belyayev Babochkano, he wantet the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALR Piranha from SWITZERLAND do be deleted.
The only aircraft (build) aircraft page he nominatet for deletion from him was the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KZD-85 from SWITZERLAND.
The only page about an Aircraft Type he was deleting out Informations is the Pilatus PC-24 from SWITZERLAND, interestingly what is "not-notable for ihm there

not bother him on any other page like Fairey Delta 1, Avro Ashton, Hawker P.1052.

From all Modern aerobatic teams and Disbanded military teams his only interest is to suppress Informations of all 4 Teams of the Air Force of SWITZERLAND, on no other Modern aerobatic team or Disbanded military team was touched from Banner. Things which he can not stand in any relation to the 4 Teams of the Air Force of SWITZERLAND not bother him on any other page even with a hint he doesent touched the Dutch Solo Display Team or F-16 Demo Team.
The only Air Force page who he tryes to "clean " is the one from SWITZERLAND.. Even if ther is an update or change in some projects (for eg. That the C-17 is no more a candidat as Cargoplane for the Swiss Air Force he does not want to admit.
The only userpage he ataked in this timeframe is my one. Inn my eyes he has also much not notable stuff on his userpage.. but I would never touch it.

So he is usualy not active in Aviatic topics most of the time with total differend topics , like Restraurants, Beautycontests,... But if it is something about swiss aivatic, and if had creadet the page or just add a few words, all hell breaks loose. I have the feeling this is Wikihounding, and Racist action against Swiss aviation topics. FFA P-16 (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice that you are looking up what I am doing. But we are discussing your user page, not what I am doing. And your user page is still containing previously deleted material that was deemed not-notable or even deleted after an AfD. The Banner talk 23:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's on my user page none of your business. The listing above simply shows your malicious action against Aiatic topics of switzerland. You should first "adjust" other aviation items before you fight against Swiss Avitic articles. otherwise you're simply not credible.FFA P-16 (talk) 12:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, see Wikipedia:User pages. But let me politely ask you to stop your personal attacks and false accusations? The Banner talk 13:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This are not false accusations, I have given the evidence, as you can see above, your only motivation in the area of aviation is to censor and delete informations associated with Switzerland. You don't Affecting another country / other aviation pages in such a way. In examples that you see noo need to delet out there something about more than 1 prototype, pilots listet up and so one. You're simply not credible.may you should first "fix" aviatic pages who are not in relation to SWITZERLAND. No freedom of expression is a fundamental right, your censorship attack is extremely vicious, just harassment and an abuse of anonymity that you have here.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.