Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eseki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eseki[edit]

FAKEARTICLE Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 09:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Short and reasonable use in userspace. Unlikely to be viewed as an article, hence "fakearticle" does not apply. Collect (talk) 10:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Please also consider this and the fact that he was blocked on meta for similar disruption. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 14:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's on userspace. No harm. Diego Grez (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or just blank it. Yes it is a fake article that has no business on a users main page. Even if we AGF, the users contribution history shows they just don't get it. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."
Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 09:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page reads like a fake article about "Kansai-ben". Cunard (talk) 09:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.