Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ericallums2007/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. G5, or general disruption. SALTing Star Mississippi 17:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ericallums2007/sandbox[edit]

User:Ericallums2007/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE for repeatedly deleted and multi-page salted topic. (See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB (2nd nomination) Dronebogus (talk) 12:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blanking is the more appropriate course of action for a user's sandbox, particularly since this isn't in draft space and therefore isn't part of that particular microcosm.--WaltClipper -(talk) 14:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think this actually applies for speedy deletion as a blocked sock creation. Dronebogus (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Dronebogus may be correct. Not enough clear evidence to be certain of a G5. No SPI, no listed sockmaster. I've asked the question at User talk:discospinster, the blocking admin. If this is not speedy material, we should courtesy blank, as we often do in such cases. BusterD (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G5 and the blocking admin's endorsement of eligibility. BusterD (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with Silver bullets. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Normally blanking would be adequate (per WaltCip) but the history of recreation, deletion, salting in other namespaces militates in favour of outright deletion. Martinp (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 03:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.