Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elektrik Band/Secret Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 20:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elektrik Band/Secret Page[edit]

Secret page; which is generally frowned upon by the community per WP:UP#GAMES. elektrik SHOOS (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Same old silly game of no educational value. Several MfDs demonstrated the community consensus is against these pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. MFDs have not demonstrated consensus against these pages. Silly games hurt no one who does not play them. The only reason to delete such pages is if they are all that the user is here for and Elektrik Band has been making article edits. jorgenev 18:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The arguments for deleting secret pages are summarized in the essay Wikipedia:Why secret pages should be deleted.
WP:UP#GAMES states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community. Games of no educational value relevant to the project are routinely deleted at MfD." WP:NOTMYSPACE states that "[t]he focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration."
To the creator: in a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34#Does WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?), community consensus was that the policy Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.