Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Edu Mabbitt/Userboxes/Japanese Girl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 10:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edu Mabbitt/Userboxes/Japanese Girl[edit]

User:Edu Mabbitt/Userboxes/Japanese Girl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No encyclopaedic value to this user box, it is quite misogynistic and more apt for some type dating website. —SpacemanSpiff 14:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not grossly misogynistic, but on the wrong side of the line, and completely unconnected to editing stuff. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clearly inappropriate. But I don't see how a userbox about loving women can possibly be misogynistic (a word which means hating women). People should stop using misogynistic when words such as slightly sexist or racially insensitive are far more accurate and appropriate. Brustopher (talk) 18:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many people feel that sexism is inherently misogynistic (although the reverse, obviously, need not be true). You may not agree with this, but the usage is logically consistent with the belief, and you clearly understand what was meant, so it's probably not worth arguing about. Xtifr tälk 07:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: there is a faint chance this was well-intentioned, but as a userbox, there is too much potential for abuse. We don't actually have a "Don't Be Creepy" policy or guideline that I can find, but something like this suggests that perhaps we should. Inappropriate, potentially divisive. Not the worst thing I've ever stumbled across, but not something I think we want to keep. Xtifr tälk 07:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.