Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Echovictor3/Bret thomas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was deleteJohnCD (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Echovictor3/Bret thomas[edit]

User:Echovictor3/Bret thomas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

POV issues, possible test page Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, possibly U5 eligible. Wikipedia is not the place to brag about your (or someone else's?) sexual prowess. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 17:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Improve and mainspace. Plausible draft and WP:V doesn't apply to drafts. According to it, it would easily pass WP:GNG. 166.170.45.122 (talk) 19:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm pretty sure Time doesn't crown a "Tonguefingers Man of the Decade" for prowess in cunnilingus. Might be G3-eligible as a hoax too, though I'd prefer to AGF that it's a test page. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Offensive hoax test page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and ignore the troll with the "WP:V doesn't apply to drafts". -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.