Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:East London Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. It will be highly recommended that user move the content to a sandbox.--Aervanath (talk) 06:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:East London Line

WP:NOT#WEBHOST. Pretty straightforward. roux 17:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Using the userspace as a news page is not really appropriate. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, user appears to be using this page to organize his efforts in the mainspace. –xeno (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I strongly disagree there, it appears to be used for up to date news and unencyclopaedic information such as bus fares. A look at the pages history confirms this. Jenuk1985 | Talk 18:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move to sandbox per Xeno. —La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 17:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently harmless and enough connected with wikipedia work to keep, although a user sandbox would be a good suggestion. Bus fares are not necessarily unencyclopedic, particularly a history of them would fit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move to sandbox as this is essentially what the page is being used for. NRTurner (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to be an accurate page, not SPAM, not WEBHOST -- might actually be useful in fact. It does not fit the deletion rules, so ought to be kept. Editor is not new, and is an active contributor, which adds reason to keep this page. Collect (talk) 12:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not tfl.gov.uk (from whence most of the content has been copied). Stifle (talk) 09:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Stifle. This isn't a website where we report the status of railways. Techman224^Talk 20:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Sandbox per NRTurner -m-i-k-e-y-^talk 11:22, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not the tidiest of userpages, but the user has made constructive (if minor) edits to Lonon Underground related pages, and part of the userpage includes a table keeping track of articles to create. Much of the content is not all that relevant for writing an encyclopedia, but using the userpage for testing out templates and tables is OK. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Justifiable as material supportive of mainspace contributions. This is a longstanding productive contributor, and deserves some trust and considerable leeway. Remove any content that violates copyright, as per Stifle, although I don't think it does, but there is no merit in deleting everything and all the history. Ask the user to move the material to a subpage, and to reserve his userpage for a more succinct description of himself. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.