Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dutchboydan/Dan DeJonge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedied. We don't need a seven-day discussion on this. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dutchboydan/Dan DeJonge[edit]

Orphaned page of indefinitely-blocked user Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 22:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The creator was a vandalism-only account, now indefinitely blocked. He created a vanity page, Dan DeJonge, which was speedily deleted and re-created in userspace. There's no reason I can see to keep the useless vanity page of an indefinitely blocked vandal, so this one's a no-brainer. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as general housecleaning but also WP:FAKEARTICLE. Miami33139 (talk) 10:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.