Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drpradeepullal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drpradeepullal[edit]

Looks like self-promotion here 山本一郎 (会話) 04:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Short c.v. is permitted use in userspace. I would prefer he make some actual article edits, but the user appears fairly new, with his initial "greeting" being notice of the MfD. Collect (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - partial copyvio of http://pradeepullal.com , Wikipedia is not a vanity press and this user appears to be not here to build the encyclopedia. MER-C 08:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment it is difficult for a person to violate his own copyright <g>. Collect (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this were an article I'd send it to Wikipedia:Copyright problems for OTRS clearing, as the author may be unaware of our licensing requirements. It isn't worth it for user pages. MER-C 08:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if the user were really here to help edit the encyclopedia, shouldn't he have done something else by now? My first instinct is to delete it for now, undeleting it on request, but ask that the CV be summarized better without any licensing issues. Imzadi 1979 → 01:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I like Imzadi's idea. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 19:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.