Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dotname2469

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dotname2469[edit]

Userpage for editor who last edited in 2011, created by unrelated newish (and rather problematic) editor, with images uploaded by yet other people. Fram (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not encyclopedic, and possibly attempting to hijack another's userspace for non-encyclopedic goofing around. Joyous! Noise! 16:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Alalch E. 16:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An intriguing and artsy form of disruption. Users normally have control over the contents of their own userpage. Creating userpages for abandoned accounts seems disruptive behavior and might be sanctionable. BusterD (talk) 18:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A strange form of disruption. The problem is not the content, but where the content is. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bizarre and not helpful. Additionally, the user who created the page seems to have WP:IDHT-type issues. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom. CastJared (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.