Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dilaudid Man/Stuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete Samir 23:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dilaudid Man/Stuff

Porn collection. No use for an encyclopedia. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UP which points out that "User pages are for communication and collaboration". This page is an unhelpful violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. Johnuniq (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm pretty sure this is a recreation of a page that was already deleted. I recall this exact gallery under a different username's account that was MfD'd in the past (and especially considering this is this user's very first edit I'd say a check for sock-puppets may be in order). I couldn't find that specific MfD page but I did find something else relevant, (although rather outdated by now) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ewlyahoocom/WikiPorn. -- œ ^™ 10:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I thought there was a more specific policy against this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, blatant violation of WP:NOT. There ought to be a speedy criterion for pages like this one (if it isn't a WP:G4 already): it's clearly entirely unrelated to the purpose of Wikipedia. Robofish (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violation of several policies. —Entropy (T/C) 21:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. SarahStierch (talk) 23:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:User pages#Images. WTucker (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsurprisingly, Delete. I don't see how this could be in any doubt. I also note that the user's only edit so far has been to create this page. The nominator's rationale is completely accurate, and I agree with Robofish's sentiment that there may well be scope for some sort of speedy deletion criterion to deal with blatantly unencyclopaedic and problematic pages such as the one that has been nominated here. Super Mario Man 13:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's an excellent collection in a user personal space, nothing wrong with that --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 00:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you cite a policy or guideline which says this? WTucker (talk) 14:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no guideline because as its name implies it is a personal user space, is not the community's business to decide what the user should or shouldn't use in his personal space unless it is a serious action that might affect the community at large which isn't the case here. --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 01:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UPNOT seems to disagree with this point of view.WTucker (talk) 02:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it disagree? Content might be somewhat graphic but they are not non-free files, most of them are CC or Public Domain, many of them used widely in other articles. Let me put it this way, if the gallery was about flowers or animals, or buildings, would we be having this discussion??. Leave the guys gallery alone, you don't like it, don't visit it then, so simple. --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 06:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:UP#Images, which states:
There is also broad consensus that you should not have any image in your userspace that would bring the project into disrepute and you may be asked to remove such images. Content clearly intended as sexually provocative (images and in some cases text) or to cause distress and shock that appears to have little or no project benefit or using Wikipedia only as a web host or personal pages or for advocacy, may be removed by any user (or deleted), subject to appeal at deletion review. (my bolding)
See also the precedent at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nmatavka/N0rp and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nmatavka/Images under surveillance. Cunard (talk) 08:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.