Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:David.snipes/Cage Rulers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Blank. — xaosflux Talk 02:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:David.snipes/Cage Rulers[edit]

User:David.snipes/Cage Rulers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 17:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Five year old stale promotional draft for a non-notable MMA organization. Editor also uploaded the logo and other parts of this draft. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and U5 should apply to this - the fact a bot added a box that includes the wor Draft is irrelevant. Legacypac (talk) 04:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"the fact a bot added a box that includes the wor Draft"? What are you talking about? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Plausibly notable, or suitable to be covered within another broad topic. {{Inactive userpage blanked}} was made, and is recommended, for this sort of thing. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • How can you say that this plausible notable? The single link provided is an error. Did you find something or is just by gut? The two blue links for fighters don't even mention this organization on their biography pages. I'm honestly trying to see where is the line between a promotional U5 problem and a plausible draft because I don't see where the plausible part is here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blank and apply {{userpage blanked}} same as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:David.snipes/sandbox 8.Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.