Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DanTheMusicMan2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:DanTheMusicMan2

Fails WP:UPNOT. See also talk page discussions. There may be some issues with a number of user sub-pages but for now this is the one that really stands out. I generally try to cut some slack when editors are personalizing their user page, but I think this just can't be squared with the community's guidelines on acceptable use of user pages. U5 CSD nomination was declined (quite correctly) given that this is a longstanding contributor to the project. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This content is clearly not related to the purposes of Wikipedia and the editor appears to be using their userpage as a web host. They have been given sufficient opportunity via their talk page to defend the content or to move it elsewhere prior to deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dan's own personal list has no place on Wikipedia. There's also the userspace work page User:DanTheMusicMan2/List of artists who reached number one on my chart TPW which is also based on Dan's own analysis, with no possible use to improve Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator and Binksternet, user pages being exclusively used to host personal lists/top 10s have no place on Wikipedia. CoolSkittle (talk) 22:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ridiculous size (452 KB!), no benefit to and not even for improving Wikipedia. Ss112 10:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One can use Microsoft Word, WordPad or failing those an online notepad to store all of this, There's a lot of leeway when it comes to userpages but this is very excessive and like others have said doesn't in any way, shape or form contribute to this project. –Davey2010^Talk 01:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In addition to everything cited above, this is just WP:LISTCRUFT and would be deleted in article space, and has almost been speedy-deleted in user space. We don't need it. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.