Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ChildofMidnight/Neutron stars in fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ ^xplicit 02:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChildofMidnight/Neutron stars in fiction[edit]

deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutron stars in fiction then userfied article, now stale for 3 years. editor not active. housekeeping to avoid google hits. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A useful source of information. Pointless and destructive to get rid of it. --GwydionM (talk) 18:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, you mean recreate as an article, right? we dont want to keep it as a user page if its useful, no one would know its there. We would keep it as a user page if the user (or another editor) wanted to try to work on it to make it better than it was at the time of its deletion. We would recreate to give it another chance at passing afd, esp. if standards for an afd for this content has changed in 3 years. I do note, of course, that the subject of neutron stars in fiction is worthy of some sort of mention, somewhere.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bad faith revision-hoarding. GwydionM's ITSUSEFUL argument was rejected at AfD. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.