Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ChildofMidnight/Arab–Israeli conflict facts, figures, and statistics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 02:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- User:ChildofMidnight/Arab–Israeli conflict facts, figures, and statistics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
deleted article, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab–Israeli conflict facts, figures, and statistics, userfied, only trivial edits by other users since. editor not active. housekeeping to avoid google hits directing people to this nonarticle page. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Replace with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. Reasonable userspace work notes. Does look a little WP:NOR, but that is not forbidden in userspace. Well blanked until its author returns. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)- It isn't "work notes", it's a userfied copy of a deleted article. CoM was an infamour early adopter of the "userfy-and-hoard" tactic to disrupt article deletion. He had no intention of working on it. As for {{inactive userpage blanked}}, I've left a note on that template talk suggesting what IMO it should and should not be used for (a hint: this is most assuredly in the latter camp). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Damn. I completely agree Chris. The nomination even links to the deletion discussion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- It isn't "work notes", it's a userfied copy of a deleted article. CoM was an infamour early adopter of the "userfy-and-hoard" tactic to disrupt article deletion. He had no intention of working on it. As for {{inactive userpage blanked}}, I've left a note on that template talk suggesting what IMO it should and should not be used for (a hint: this is most assuredly in the latter camp). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.