Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ceroberts/Opening a Home Day Care

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ‑Scottywong| [talk] || 17:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ceroberts/Opening a Home Day Care[edit]

User:Ceroberts/Opening a Home Day Care (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This draft has been abandoned for eight years and fails WP:NOTGUIDE. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Another abandoned quasi-draft. As noted, not likely to be accepted anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - won't disagree with it being lousy content, however, being old or lacking potential aren't valid reasons to delete a sandbox as per WP:STALE. If seeing subpar pages in other people's userspace rankles someone, and that user is inactive, it is permitted to blank. MfD is for when would be problematic even if blanked. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rhododendrites: I agree that blanking is a good idea. However, I think that it would qualify for WP:U5 as it is not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    No comment/objections from me about U5 here. Seems borderline, but clearly a NOTHOWTO problem. If something is egregious enough to meet CSD, then it should indeed be speedied. My objection is when something doesn't qualify for CSD, and people bring it to MfD on a "but I really want it to qualify for CSD" basis, when it could just be blanked. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Should be a G13, but given poor topic and state, we might as well delete here. Britishfinance (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.