Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Candyo32/Jessica Jarrell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was deleteJohnCD (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Candyo32/Jessica Jarrell[edit]

User:Candyo32/Jessica Jarrell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jarrell and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jarrell (2nd nomination) both resulted in "delete". A deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 4 endorsed the deletion. Five repeated recreations since then have led to the article being salted. However, in the deletion review Candyo32 said "new information has come up as I found out the article met WP:MUSICBIO's #1 & #11", so the article was userfied to allow references to the "new information" to be added. That userfication took place on 11 May 2010‎, since when no substantial editing has taken place, and certainly no attempt has been made to add the supposed new evidence of notability. The total changes since userfication can be seen here. Wikipedia:User pages is quite clear: "Userspace ... should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content". The userfication has not achieved the purpose for which it was done, and after just a few days short of two years it is time to delete the userfied article. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or if the subject is indeed notable and that notability can be shown with reliable sources then do so and move to mainspace. Editor is otherwise active so may have just forgotten about this subpage. Syrthiss (talk) 12:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per G4. This was deleted per discussion, and no attempt has been made to produce a better draft in User Space. Achowat (talk) 13:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. After a very long time, User:Candyo32 has not added the sources he alluded to at DRV. CSD:G4 doesn't include userspace based on an AfD decision. ---SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.