Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Arezush.76/امیرحسین شاکر
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
User:Arezush.76 is the coach of the fencer Amirhossein Shaker and uploaded this reference-free biography which is a machine-translated Iranian Wikipedia article about Amirhossein Shaker (where it is undergoing AfD) to their userspace, but User:Shakeronly (who did not deny the implication that he is Amirhossein Shaker when asked not to write about himself; edit: as it turns out he is another coach, or "teacher") had already done this a short time ago, creating Draft:Amirhossein Shaker which does have references. If this page is not deleted it will stay like this forever. Not an appropriate use of userspace. I tried to get the user to agree to G7 but they don't know English well enough to effectively communicate (edit: my opinion at the time, but not really a correct assessment). —Alalch E. 07:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- He is not Amir Hossein Shaker. He is 50 years old and has been a member of Wikipedia for 13 years. If Amir Hossein Shaker is about 22 years old and is a famous athlete .
- He has not written an article about himself and this is due to the lack of information of some users Arezush.76 (talk) 00:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Requested G7, creator has communicated that she agrees with deletion after all—Alalch E. 10:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- G7 was declined.—Alalch E. 09:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Liz and Bbb23: it appears that the creator agreed to the deletion since there's a parallel draft Draft:Amirhossein Shaker. Curious why this wouldn't' be an acceptable G7. Star Mississippi 00:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- G7 was declined.—Alalch E. 09:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as an unsourced biography of a living person in user space, and BLPs in user space must comply with verifiability just as in article space. It also apparently mixes AH and CE dates (and the English Wikipedia should use CE dates, with clearly labeled AH dates as optional), but that would be a reason for tagging, not deletion. There are numbers that indicate where the references ought to be, but they are not references. The Heymann criterion is to add references. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.