Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aleister Wilson/ethereal being

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several drafts using the former contents of Ethereal being[edit]

All of these drafts were seemingly created when the former contents of Ethereal being were restored during the course of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethereal beings (which resulted in "delete") and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July 2#Ethereal being (which resulted in "endorse"). Almost none, if any, of these drafts have been substantially updated since 2012. Since there are so many copies of this deleted page, but because they also have not been edited in so long, I recommend either move one of the pages to Draft:Ethereal being and redirect the rest there or delete all. (I'm more partial to the latter option since they are each almost 4 years old with no major improvements.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. The House of Angels version was created in May 2011 and predates the deletion and seems to have been merged into the mainspace one so it should be treated as if it would have been deleted when the mainspace one was deleted. The remaining ones are blatant copyright violations in that they without attribution are copying from Wikipedia itself (although Smallman12q names the article, but not the version, and Stevertigo names the wrong page). If someone wants the actual contents, they can make a request for a draft or userification at this point forward (draftspace was meant for this), and the mainspace version with all the prior history can be restored and used. Else this was the wrong way to do that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. We're not a web host for deleted content. ~ Rob^Talk 11:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an attempt to circumvent deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.