Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Albatalab/Comorian passport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Redirect. — xaosflux Talk 21:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Albatalab/Comorian passport[edit]

User:Albatalab/Comorian passport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not enough for an article, too obvious. Likely covered elsewhere anyway. Old stale draft. Legacypac (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blank and apply {{Userpage blanked}} per WP:STALEDRAFT.Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with a bias against blanking, as this sort of work should be encouraged. Agree it is probably insufficient for its own article, but I don't think the content is currently in Wikipedia. I get no hits searching "passport" on Comoros. Additionally, draft is as non-problematic as can be and no benefit is derived from deletion (or blanking, for that matter). A2soup (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already exists Comorian passport. This userpage is redundant. Legacypac (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I didn't even check for an article - since your nom stated "not enough for an article", I assumed there wasn't one. In any case, I still see no benefit to the project from deleting this good-faith draft. I would be okay with redirecting to the mainspace page (unless you intend to AfD it). A2soup (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.