Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Agkimball/JaLynn Prince

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Agkimball/JaLynn Prince[edit]

WP:NOTRESUME case. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to JaLynn Prince, or history-merge if someone has a need for administrative overkill. The state of the current article is proof that Legacypac fails to recognize a good draft when he sees one. ~~Ban Legacypac from nominations, due to his frequency of perfunctory and erroneous nominations~~retract, is an outlier in recent quality nominations --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, with only a single source to a church paper, it looked like promotion. Not sure that the target article passes GNG but a redirect is fine since it exists. I'll Withdraw' and redirect it. Legacypac (talk) 04:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's why mainspace standards are not to be applied to userspace. Userspace is the backrooms, hidden away from the real world, not easily confused with mainspace. The article has better sourcing, and we don't evaluate the GNG at MfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.