Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Agarwal.rgniyd/common.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete WP:CSD#G6, obviously created in error. ansh 666 23:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Agarwal.rgniyd/common.css[edit]

U5 Cabayi (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question I've never seen a CSS page nominated and I can't edit it. So can we delete it? Why delete it? Legacypac (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac because it's a page "in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages". Should it be bulletproof just because it's more difficult to dispose of it? Is it good practice to allow violations of policy if it's in a .css or .js file? How about the copyright violation in User:Dquiambao/common.css? (input welcome at its MfD) Cabayi (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Admins can edit and delete CSS/JS pages. MER-C 21:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by all means. How did you find these? Legacypac (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete out of project scope. Not valid CSS content, basically editing experiments. Technically this can be deleted by admins, but I could not add the {{mfd}} header either. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 18:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.