Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:सुमित सिंह

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep - resolved via editing. — xaosflux Talk 05:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:सुमित सिंह (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Self promoting Biographical article Mahensingha Talk 18:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article सुमित सिंह is just a User profile. It is not a autobiographical article that published to selfprompt. Several User page exit on wikipedia, सुमित सिंह is just like them. I have added about myself but that is only the part of my user profile information. I would appreciate if this article consider in this manner. Thank You and please remove MfD nomination from article सुमित सिंह सुमित सिंह (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC) सुमित सिंह (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is unambiguous use of Wikipedia to host a personal "profile" page, unrelated to work on Wikipedia, apart from one brief sentence just about mentioning Wikipedia. If it is true that there are several other similar user pages, then that is a reason to delete them, not a reason to keep this one. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Previously also the said user has created page with Name User:Sumit Singh, which was deleted for the same reason. Now again he ha done the same. His talk page shows details of this See Here. It seems that he cleverly removed the deletion proposal tag using a different I.P., as tracing the IP it could easily be established that it was often and exclusively used for editing the target user page onlySee here. Also to be noted that the tone of the page is alike social networking site profile pages.-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 06:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply : Dear User:RHaworth, I really appreciate your feelings of help and support but have you seen the page and seeing the userboxes present over there, can you answer " How an editor with merely Total edits (including deleted): 209 have acquired the Afc submission review membership. I personally need nothing to do with all this but being a true Wikipedian recent changes patroller, it was my duty, rest all depends on the people who ensure strict follow up of Wikipedia policies. I suggest you to guide the User:सुमित सिंह to well acquaint himself with the policies. A good wikipedian always respects the rules and policies.-- Mahensingha (Talk) "Thanx n Regards" 14:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
* Posted Afc comments on my talk page but perhaps it was copy and paste of the comments placed by mistake, hence ignorable and not an issue. However you can see See here.
  • Keep While I agree the state the page was in when they debate started justified the MfD it has since been modified to the point where I think it is acceptable. Its current state is nothing but a brief introduction, a listing of specialized skills, and some nice userboxes. Chillum 18:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.