Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template talk:Infobox video game/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy redirect to Template talk:Infobox video game (WP:NAC). Keφr 19:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Infobox video game/sandbox

Only one edit in page history; I don't see how a template sandbox is useful to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games over the actual template itself here. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 02:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep They're not mutually exclusive and seeing it tagged might help someone find that there is a sandbox. WP:AINTBROKE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template talk:Infobox video game to keep discussions together. Keφr 16:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think there might be some confusion here. The article being tagged for MfD discussion is the talk page of a sandbox template. From the nomination it sounds like the template itself should have been tagged. Anyways, looking at the history of the sandbox template shows it has had fairly recent use, so we may as well keep it around. I don't know if it's standard practice to redirect the Template Talk: page, but that doesn't require an MfD. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 23:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, there might be. User:TeleComNasSprVen, can you clear this up? Keφr 09:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - On second thought, redirection might just be the best option. When I saw it I found it ridiculous why any WikiProject would want to monitor a sandbox template over monitoring the actual template itself, so that's why I nominated. I would support you closing the MfD and redirecting as appropriate. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 19:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think the WikiProject will probably be interested in both. But never mind that. Keφr 19:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.