Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete all. Bencherlite ^Talk 12:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-0[edit]

Borderline attack on a living person. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nominator.Acather96 (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete So do I. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come yell at me!)} 18:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete However, this is the wrong place (I think). Please renominate at WP:TFD and include the six templates shown here. Johnuniq (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Top of this page: "eligible for deletion here are: [...] * userboxes, regardless of namespace."
I don't think that all of those other userboxes are equally as offensive. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this nomination passes, I will probably nominate 1 and 2; the others I don't see as offensive. (If you disagree, you are welcome to nominate them.) עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agreed, this is terrible, and even if this is kept it should be moved to userspace. Kayau Voting IS evil 09:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Harmful without redeeming use. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This template is very hate. SnottyWong ^confess 22:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: These pages should be included in this nomination:

Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-1
Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-2
Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-3
Template:User Shōko Nakagawa Fan-4

SnottyWong ^chat 22:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per SmokeyJoe and others--SPhilbrick T 12:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.