Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Subtitle (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Subtitle (disambiguation)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. WP:AFD is the correct venue for disambiguation pages. As there's substantive discussion here, I'll copy the relevant comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subtitle (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) IffyChat -- 14:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subtitle (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per Talk:Subtitle#Requested move 24 February 2019 the disambiguation page has been handled with a hatnote on Subtitle. SITH (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac, as the requested move was successful and the nominator also included the statement about deleting the disambiguation page, as a part of the post-move clean-up process I am obliged to procedurally nominate it. I should have made it clear I have no opinion on this. SITH (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. This has history but there are a lot of deleted duplicate articles around the topic of subtitles. wumbolo ^^^ 10:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and speedy close - am I the only one that sees three entries on this DAB page? Why would we ever delete a DAB page with more 3 or more entries. More important, this page has SIGNIFICANT history - see this edit which notes a page split. Ridiculous nomination. -- Netoholic @ 10:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Netoholic, please see my reply to Legacypac above. And try to be nice, you made your point, there's no point calling an action I was bound to undertake by procedure as ridiculous. SITH (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some level of due care is necessary. We do not nominate for deletion pages with significant edit history. This page's edit history is the very origin of the article now sitting at primary. -- Netoholic @ 11:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.