Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Robotics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Robotics[edit]

Portal:Robotics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This portal has been effectively abandoned for many years. The restored version has news from 2012 [1] placed there in 2012 after the previous news from 2007 was removed [2] . The selected image is from 2004. It was automated because it was not being maintained, and that was just reverted, which does not resolve the years of disinterest. Robotics is an exciting fast moving field, but you would never know that from this portal. Legacypac (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, complete return to the original version which was much more attractive and seek maintainers; the wikiproject still seems active and might be interested. Another former featured portal on a broad, interesting topic. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and Revert to this version, which precedes all automation that occurred afterward. It's a former Featured portal. North America1000 06:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Based on a level-3 vital article, this is certainly a broad enough topic to support a Portal. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral with the following comments:
      • Level 3, Level 2, Level 4 Vital articles are a nonsensical idea.
      • Portals should be maintained before deciding to keep them.
      • This one was not being maintained.
      • It is hard to say who abandoned this portal. Many inactive editors touched it. One of the first touches was TTH, who is not inactive and has not abandoned it, and so should be considered the maintainer, which is not much of an argument.
      • If kept, should be eligible for renomination in 60 days. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Old portal, 63 subpages, created 2005-12-24 18:25:43 by User:Yorktown1776~enwiki. A comment by a maintainer, if any, could make the day. Portal:Robotics. Pldx1 (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 15:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.